![]() Help in circumventing copy protection or other forms of content protection - That's piracy, and that's not allowed here.Someone to do your homework for you - Do your own work.Otherwise, finding someone in your local community is best. A source for free labor - You'll be expected to volunteer your time or pay.A resource for people to learn new things about editing.A place where people can seek feedback on their work (please use the monthly threads).A place where people can ask questions about editing, from storytelling to technique to technical tricks.Our Wiki with Common questions/answers What We Are: We expect everyone to be civil and generally not act like a jerk. Posting your "video editing services" (No, not free either)īe respectful.Have a question about: Monthly thread "What software should I use?" Monthly thread for "What hardware should I use?" Monthly Feedback on your edit with the caveat that you need to comment on someone else's thread. The important thing, however, is that if you opt for a low-quality mic, you'll get low-quality sound.This reddit is to ask basic and intermediate questions about editing, primarily for home and personal use. I've since upgraded to the CAD E100S because I feel like it has more warmth and range. When I first started podcasting and audiobook recording, the Blue Yeti was my mic of choice. ![]() One of the best mics on the market for podcasting is the Blue Yeti (reviewed here). What I will say is that there are plenty of pro-sounding mics at non-pro prices. I won't go into all the details here (such as dynamic or condenser, cardioid vs. If you use any old cheap mic, you'll find it picks up a lot of extraneous noise and won't produce enough dynamic range to sound professional. If you really want a professional-sounding podcast, you need a pro (or prosumer) microphone, such as my favorite, the CAD E100S. The right microphoneīefore I get into background noise and how to remove it in Audacity, I want to first address your microphone. Within the realm of podcasts, there's nothing more off-putting than poor audio. ![]() If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. ![]() Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |